Asus EEE PC 900 Vista Vs XP Vs Linux – Boot & Shutdown Test
Asus EEE PC 900 Vista Vs XP Vs Linux – Boot & Shutdown Test This is the video you have all been requesting, a benchmark between all three systems. After the 3D mark 2003 tests, I was considering a way of benchmarking Linux as well. I did a ray tracing test and a few others but they were not very watchable or YouTube friendly. The test most of you have requested is a straight forward boot test between Linux, XP and Vista. My conclusion is that Linux is still the fastest but not by much. XP works perfectly and very close to Linux and the fact that Vista runs as well as it does at all it great. XP and Linux are very much on par for those of you mulling over which system to buy. The performance difference is negligible when you consider the superior device support XP has over Linux. Anyway, I think all three systems have their merits and detractions so please comment away on your thoughts. Please comment away on your thoughts. Earthling10@hotmail.com Thanks for watching.
Asus EEE PC 900 Vista Vs XP Vs Linux - Boot & Shutdown Test dies das Video ist, Sie alle wurde anfordern haben, eine Benchmark zwischen allen drei Systemen. Nachdem die 3D mark 2003 Prüfungen, überlegte ich einen Weg von Linux sowie benchmarking. Ich habe ein Strahl Ablaufverfolgung Test und ein paar andere, aber sie waren nicht sehr sehenswerter oder YouTube freundlich. Der Test, die meisten von Ihnen angefordert haben ist ein einfaches Boot zwischen Linux, XP und Vista. Meine Schlussfolgerung ist, dass Linux immer noch die schnellste, aber nicht durch viel. XP funktioniert perfekt und sehr nah an Linux und die Tatsache, die Vista ausgeführt wird, sowie es tut überhaupt es groß. XP und Linux sind sehr auf Stufe für diejenigen unter Ihnen Grübeln über das System zu kaufen. Unterschied in der Leistung ist vernachlässigbar, wenn Sie die überlegene Geräteunterstützung betrachten, die XP über Linux hat. Anyway, ich glaube, alle drei Systeme haben ihre Vorzüge und schmälern also bitte Kommentar entfernt auf Ihre Meinung. Bitte äußern Sie entfernt auf Ihre Meinung. Asus, Boot, LINUX, Shutdown, Test, Vista, www.youtube.com,
July 2nd, 2010 12:11
What version of linux did you use?
July 2nd, 2010 13:07
Vista is dreadful, no wonder I bought a MacBook!
July 2nd, 2010 13:47
vistas shut down time is pathetic, reminds me of September, i used to take my laptop to school (its a turion x2 at 2.1 with 2.8 gb of ram, so its not bad) but the bell would go and it would take me sooo long to get out of class, i swear my friends hated me till i upgraded to 7
July 2nd, 2010 14:00
what linux you install in this computer ???
July 2nd, 2010 14:26
and by the way.. Imo a computer havn’t started up, before its ready to use, and as everybody who has ever used a windows computer knows that it always has to load some a whole bunch of cr*p..
July 2nd, 2010 14:37
well, if you all agree that the xp has started up before the startup sound your some dumb f*cks..
And, how can you say xp, vista and linux.. Linux is like saying windows just even more wide… say the f*cking name of the distro!!
July 2nd, 2010 14:55
linux es mejor que windows
July 2nd, 2010 15:27
wow so thats why i still see xp on the small laptops at bastbuy and vista does fail
July 2nd, 2010 15:45
thanks .merci la preuve en image que vista est lourd
July 2nd, 2010 16:00
43 seconds to turn off… OMG
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDd
July 2nd, 2010 16:45
@earthling10 that was on the Acer, the EEEPC has Linux Xandros.
July 2nd, 2010 17:40
VISTA SUCKS D:
July 2nd, 2010 18:38
Lol Vista is so shite
July 2nd, 2010 18:51
Vista lost, the harddrive isn’t built for vista it was built for XP, however in looks i think Vista wins
July 2nd, 2010 19:26
Great demonstration! It’s really helpfull for me, becouse i’m going do buy this netbook. Thanks!
July 2nd, 2010 19:47
What distro/DE are we using on the linux book? I bet we could shave some more time off that things boot.
“The performance difference is negligible when you consider the superior device support XP has over Linux.”
I’ve said that alot, I just switched the terms “device support” and “performance”.
July 2nd, 2010 19:53
ask them not me
July 2nd, 2010 20:51
Why do microsoft want to make windows 8 128bit then?
July 2nd, 2010 21:48
64bit can use a maximum of 16TERABYTES of ram, no civilian has that much ram in one machine
July 2nd, 2010 22:28
is that supposed to be English ?
July 2nd, 2010 23:04
@whatatidymess
128 bit dosent mean anything runs faster. just lets your use more memory. like i said before you dont need a few hundred terabytes of ram lol
July 2nd, 2010 23:11
7′s ok, 128 bit os? more Power and speed, more sophisticated apps that will run faster.
July 2nd, 2010 23:18
@whatatidymess
windows 7 is awsome lol. and why the fuck would you need a 128 bit os? really dude? why would we need a couple hundred terabytes of ram -.-
July 2nd, 2010 23:27
I don’t like 7 or vista, xp all the way, well tell windows 8 and 128 bit cpu’s come out….
would like to see how 7 does though.
July 2nd, 2010 23:54
or maybe vista vs windows 7