«
»

Windows 7 vs Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx Boot time?


First of Let me get this out. I know this is an unfair test, As the Windows machine has a raid card, but understand the Windows machine is far more powerful. Specs as follows for Windows machine. Dual 3.0Ghz Intel Xeon (2MB L2 Cache per processor) 6GB of Ram @ 400MHz 10k RPM SCSI Drive ATi x700 Pro Graphics card. Specs for the Ubuntu system 1 x 3.0GHz Intel Xeon (2MB L2 Cache) 4GB of RAM @ 400MHz 7200RPM Sata Drive nVidia Quadro NVS 280 Both machines have the Same motherboard too. Hyper Theading enabled on both machines. And both systems are 64bit OSs







Zunächst lassen Sie mich dies raus. Ich weiß, dass dies ist ein unfairer Test, der Windows Maschine hat eine Raid-Karte, aber verstehen, dass die Windows-Maschine viel leistungsfähiger ist. Angaben wie folgt für Windows-Rechner. Zwei 3,0 Ghz Intel Xeon (2 MB L2-Cache pro Prozessor) 6 GB Ram @ 400 MHz 10 k u/min SCSI Laufwerk ATi X 700 Pro Grafikkarte. Daten für die Ubuntu-System 1 x 3,0 GHz Intel Xeon (2 MB L2-Cache) 4 GB RAM @ 400 MHz 7.200 u/min Sata-Laufwerk nVidia Quadro NVS 280 sowohl Maschinen haben das gleiche Motherboard zu. Hyper Theading auf beiden Rechnern aktiviert. Und beide Systeme sind 64bit OSs. 10.04, Boot, Lucid, Lynx, time, Ubuntu, Windows, windows 7, windows 7 vs ubuntu 10, windows 7 vs ubuntu 10.04, www.youtube.com,

This entry was posted on Monday, May 24th, 2010 at 8:49 pm and is filed under Windows 7. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

8 Responses to “Windows 7 vs Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx Boot time?”

  • 1
    Jucebox3000
    May 24th, 2010 21:47

    obviously ubuntu 10.04 runs faster.
    i actually have two operating systems in one computer.
    windows xp home editon sp3 and ubuntu 10.04. i ve calculated how long it would take ubuntu is the fastest. to me also the best!

  • 2
    PC4LinuxFreak
    May 24th, 2010 22:27

    Yeah programs that installed in Windows take longer to actually boot, so even though it’s on everything is not working off the bat. You generally need to to wait a few more seconds 10-20 in order to actually open applications. In Ubuntu you can start surfing the web once the desktop has loaded, mac and Linux are the same when it comes to this. This is something Windows has yet to master. having said that, Windows 7 is a huge improvement over Vista and XP.

  • 3
    igorpan
    May 24th, 2010 22:49

    Yep,on windows you need to wait few seconds after desktop is loaded,on Ubuntu you dont have to

  • 4
    aradoraristata
    May 24th, 2010 23:00

    Actually, that wasn’t close at all. The moment you see the Desktop in Windows means nothing. Almost a third of the stuff still has to load. The right way to do this test is to have both open Firefox and go to a home page. That eliminates the error caused by back ground loading since it shows you when you can actually start working.

  • 5
    dusty2714
    May 24th, 2010 23:06

    HHAHAHHAHAHAH!!!!!! windows is hored!!!! Linux Rocks!

  • 6
    mkrmec
    May 25th, 2010 00:01

    did you disable floppy drive on Ubuntu BOX in the bios? it cuts about 5 sec of load time off my machine.. if not more.

  • 7
    kamaboko1
    May 25th, 2010 00:41

    shoot me in the head. anoooooother boot up video. ahhhhhhhhhhhggggggg

  • 8
    korwinblue
    May 25th, 2010 00:55

    Wow, that was very close. And it looks like Ubuntu powered on late!

Leave a Reply

ubuntu 10 vs windows xp, ubuntu 10 vs xp, ubuntu 10 04 vs windows 7 boot time, ubuntu lynx floppy, ubuntu10 vs xp