Is it Windows 7 or KDE 4? In this video, you take to Sydney’s streets to find out what people consider of what they consider is the Windows 7 demonstration. from ZDNET: www.zdnet.com.au
vista fails at life and is an embarrassment. sadly microsoft had like 1 bugged OS for every attempt in a new one.
windows 3.0 was debugged to 3.1
windows 95 sucked and 98 switched around
windows me was like a bugged 2000
windows vista was a sad attempt of windows 7
I see a lot of artefacts, when he opening some pictures. Its slow, and luggy. But for teenagers, it look “soooo cooool”. Linux is great system, but why do you want to make it look like windows? Try new GUI and new features. Dont copy windows (macs) ideas.
id rather use a OS that works out of the box TBH , nothing wrong with linux if u know how to do it , but otherwise its no good for ANY avg user who dosnt have time to WASTE , many people in the world have lifes to get on with
That’s not a KDE problem. Media apps use libraries for their codecs and some distributions (like ubuntu) tend to ship without proprietary codecs. If you are online when trying to play a file, the codec will be downloaded automatically (just like Windows Media Player – just that wmp doesn’t open a new window). If you want a media player that just works, use a libavcodec-based one like vlc or mplayer (on any OS you want – they even work on windows!).
You can do this with EVERYTHING.
I have a non-standard skin on my XP and when is showed some stuff on my pc, they the skin and asked me if it was Windows 7.
I was just like: …. WTF … DUDE.
But like the people in the movie, they just dont care so much for OS’s or their pc’s
This dull fact is the one which distinguishes KDE from other operating systems. Its a simple one which should almost be common knowledge at this stage… or course it takes some people a while to reach the standard of common knowledge.
Regardless… they should notice that no Windows logos are present in the OS…. this currently IS common knowledge!
Filling in missing letters should be your job, nobody elses… I can’t believe you are trying to blame me for your bad english! xD
uneducated or just ignorants to something you know? the fact that they dont recognize something so trivial as the K standing for KDE doesent make them idiots, assuming they are idiots for ignoring such dull fact make you a retarded scum… and my other comment just was missing letters, but it is not a surprise you couldnt fill the spaces, really hard task for such a basic brain
25 Responses to IS IT WINDOWS 7 OR KDE 4?
tomaccogoats
March 9th, 2010 at 9:42 pm
I use windows cuz I can has videogames and full direct x support
hatwithfloppers
March 9th, 2010 at 10:23 pm
Everybody are using vista, but they don’t know that it’s shit! I get so frustrated …
awesomenessguess11
March 9th, 2010 at 10:54 pm
@Nepster92 Well then you must have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.
stonix1992
March 9th, 2010 at 11:24 pm
i also hope kde5 will look great and innovative
the artifacts are because of graphicscard is too slow and the opensource videodriver Su****s
Thalario
March 9th, 2010 at 11:55 pm
I’m sorry, are you 92 years old?
And “windows GUI ideas” don’t make sense, seriously.
fransisfordcoppola
March 10th, 2010 at 12:48 am
The Reptilians Man and 0.19 e 2.19 HELP HELP HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!
berettaNZ
March 10th, 2010 at 1:16 am
Hmmm, it sounds like you haven’t used a recent Linux distro if you still think that.
stickman2012
March 10th, 2010 at 1:18 am
vista fails at life and is an embarrassment. sadly microsoft had like 1 bugged OS for every attempt in a new one.
windows 3.0 was debugged to 3.1
windows 95 sucked and 98 switched around
windows me was like a bugged 2000
windows vista was a sad attempt of windows 7
Nepster92
March 10th, 2010 at 1:59 am
I see a lot of artefacts, when he opening some pictures. Its slow, and luggy. But for teenagers, it look “soooo cooool”. Linux is great system, but why do you want to make it look like windows? Try new GUI and new features. Dont copy windows (macs) ideas.
TradieTrev
March 10th, 2010 at 2:38 am
then why did you make a comment about this clip on youtube? Perhaps you should take your own advice.
heydude09876
March 10th, 2010 at 2:57 am
That is a HUGE generalization!
I can name 2 Linux distros that are easier than windows 7 and Mac OS X
they are
QOS (linpus)
and Chrome OS (google)
their is also Ubuntu witch I say would Qualify
as being as user friendly as windows
(sorry for the repetitive “as”)
yeomond
March 10th, 2010 at 3:56 am
LOL linux is harder to use than windows.
btw kde already looks like that since a long time ago.
antifanboi
March 10th, 2010 at 4:09 am
What did we learn? That Australians know nothing about computers….
girlsdrinkfeck
March 10th, 2010 at 4:21 am
id rather use a OS that works out of the box TBH , nothing wrong with linux if u know how to do it , but otherwise its no good for ANY avg user who dosnt have time to WASTE , many people in the world have lifes to get on with
EmpInd
March 10th, 2010 at 5:08 am
Once you install all codecs you can do all that Windows can & more.
Windows 7 just comes with mp3 & WMA decoders only. Mp3 is royalty free while WMA & WMV is not.
With Linux you can all mp4 (In many flavors), mp3, OGG, AAC, WMA, WMV, Quicktime Mov, Real & more.
Of course, you can pay royalties to the microsoft & real versions. Unless you add the codecs yourself.
EmpInd
March 10th, 2010 at 5:32 am
KDE4 ROCKS!!.
And this guys didn’t show Compiz, or people in the video would have whent BOOM!! out of their socks.
tangenz
March 10th, 2010 at 6:02 am
That’s not a KDE problem. Media apps use libraries for their codecs and some distributions (like ubuntu) tend to ship without proprietary codecs. If you are online when trying to play a file, the codec will be downloaded automatically (just like Windows Media Player – just that wmp doesn’t open a new window). If you want a media player that just works, use a libavcodec-based one like vlc or mplayer (on any OS you want – they even work on windows!).
girlsdrinkfeck
March 10th, 2010 at 6:04 am
theyll be shocked when they realise that KDE sucks after a fresh install because it wont even play mp3’s or basic avi video lmao , windows 7 FTW
grol4
March 10th, 2010 at 6:20 am
You can do this with EVERYTHING.
I have a non-standard skin on my XP and when is showed some stuff on my pc, they the skin and asked me if it was Windows 7.
I was just like: …. WTF … DUDE.
But like the people in the movie, they just dont care so much for OS’s or their pc’s
Lacotemale
March 10th, 2010 at 6:21 am
This dull fact is the one which distinguishes KDE from other operating systems. Its a simple one which should almost be common knowledge at this stage… or course it takes some people a while to reach the standard of common knowledge.
Regardless… they should notice that no Windows logos are present in the OS…. this currently IS common knowledge!
Filling in missing letters should be your job, nobody elses… I can’t believe you are trying to blame me for your bad english! xD
Dreadfultime
March 10th, 2010 at 6:45 am
uneducated or just ignorants to something you know? the fact that they dont recognize something so trivial as the K standing for KDE doesent make them idiots, assuming they are idiots for ignoring such dull fact make you a retarded scum… and my other comment just was missing letters, but it is not a surprise you couldnt fill the spaces, really hard task for such a basic brain
Lacotemale
March 10th, 2010 at 7:25 am
Actually people should recognize the K as representing KDE otherwise they are just uneducated… A.K.A idiots!
I found it hard to respond to your argument because your english was so bad! xD
Dreadfultime
March 10th, 2010 at 7:29 am
ooh, nothing to say about the argument? yeah, youre an idiot
Lacotemale
March 10th, 2010 at 7:57 am
Come back to me when you get yourself some english lessons.
Dreadfultime
March 10th, 2010 at 8:13 am
not all people should identify the fucking K as KDE corporate identity… the could think of it as windows konquer or anything like it, are you idiot?