Is it Windows 7 or KDE 4?
Is it Windows 7 or KDE 4? In this video, we take to Sydney’s streets to find out what people think of what they think is a Windows 7 demonstration. from ZDNET: www.zdnet.com.au
Ist es Windows 7 oder KDE 4? In diesem Video nehmen wir an Sydneys Straßen um herauszufinden, was die Leute denken von dem, was sie denken eine Windows 7-Demonstration ist. von ZDNET: www.zdnet.com.au. Windows, windows 7, www.youtube.com,
March 9th, 2010 21:42
I use windows cuz I can has videogames and full direct x support
March 9th, 2010 22:23
Everybody are using vista, but they don’t know that it’s shit! I get so frustrated …
March 9th, 2010 22:54
@Nepster92 Well then you must have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.
March 9th, 2010 23:24
i also hope kde5 will look great and innovative
the artifacts are because of graphicscard is too slow and the opensource videodriver Su****s
March 9th, 2010 23:55
I’m sorry, are you 92 years old?
And “windows GUI ideas” don’t make sense, seriously.
March 10th, 2010 00:48
The Reptilians Man and 0.19 e 2.19 HELP HELP HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!
March 10th, 2010 01:16
Hmmm, it sounds like you haven’t used a recent Linux distro if you still think that.
March 10th, 2010 01:18
vista fails at life and is an embarrassment. sadly microsoft had like 1 bugged OS for every attempt in a new one.
windows 3.0 was debugged to 3.1
windows 95 sucked and 98 switched around
windows me was like a bugged 2000
windows vista was a sad attempt of windows 7
March 10th, 2010 01:59
I see a lot of artefacts, when he opening some pictures. Its slow, and luggy. But for teenagers, it look “soooo cooool”. Linux is great system, but why do you want to make it look like windows? Try new GUI and new features. Dont copy windows (macs) ideas.
March 10th, 2010 02:38
then why did you make a comment about this clip on youtube? Perhaps you should take your own advice.
March 10th, 2010 02:57
That is a HUGE generalization!
I can name 2 Linux distros that are easier than windows 7 and Mac OS X
they are
QOS (linpus)
and Chrome OS (google)
their is also Ubuntu witch I say would Qualify
as being as user friendly as windows
(sorry for the repetitive “as”)
March 10th, 2010 03:56
LOL linux is harder to use than windows.
btw kde already looks like that since a long time ago.
March 10th, 2010 04:09
What did we learn? That Australians know nothing about computers….
March 10th, 2010 04:21
id rather use a OS that works out of the box TBH , nothing wrong with linux if u know how to do it , but otherwise its no good for ANY avg user who dosnt have time to WASTE , many people in the world have lifes to get on with
March 10th, 2010 05:08
Once you install all codecs you can do all that Windows can & more.
Windows 7 just comes with mp3 & WMA decoders only. Mp3 is royalty free while WMA & WMV is not.
With Linux you can all mp4 (In many flavors), mp3, OGG, AAC, WMA, WMV, Quicktime Mov, Real & more.
Of course, you can pay royalties to the microsoft & real versions. Unless you add the codecs yourself.
March 10th, 2010 05:32
KDE4 ROCKS!!.
And this guys didn’t show Compiz, or people in the video would have whent BOOM!! out of their socks.
March 10th, 2010 06:02
That’s not a KDE problem. Media apps use libraries for their codecs and some distributions (like ubuntu) tend to ship without proprietary codecs. If you are online when trying to play a file, the codec will be downloaded automatically (just like Windows Media Player – just that wmp doesn’t open a new window). If you want a media player that just works, use a libavcodec-based one like vlc or mplayer (on any OS you want – they even work on windows!).
March 10th, 2010 06:04
theyll be shocked when they realise that KDE sucks after a fresh install because it wont even play mp3′s or basic avi video lmao , windows 7 FTW
March 10th, 2010 06:20
You can do this with EVERYTHING.
I have a non-standard skin on my XP and when is showed some stuff on my pc, they the skin and asked me if it was Windows 7.
I was just like: …. WTF … DUDE.
But like the people in the movie, they just dont care so much for OS’s or their pc’s
March 10th, 2010 06:21
This dull fact is the one which distinguishes KDE from other operating systems. Its a simple one which should almost be common knowledge at this stage… or course it takes some people a while to reach the standard of common knowledge.
Regardless… they should notice that no Windows logos are present in the OS…. this currently IS common knowledge!
Filling in missing letters should be your job, nobody elses… I can’t believe you are trying to blame me for your bad english! xD
March 10th, 2010 06:45
uneducated or just ignorants to something you know? the fact that they dont recognize something so trivial as the K standing for KDE doesent make them idiots, assuming they are idiots for ignoring such dull fact make you a retarded scum… and my other comment just was missing letters, but it is not a surprise you couldnt fill the spaces, really hard task for such a basic brain
March 10th, 2010 07:25
Actually people should recognize the K as representing KDE otherwise they are just uneducated… A.K.A idiots!
I found it hard to respond to your argument because your english was so bad! xD
March 10th, 2010 07:29
ooh, nothing to say about the argument? yeah, youre an idiot
March 10th, 2010 07:57
Come back to me when you get yourself some english lessons.
March 10th, 2010 08:13
not all people should identify the fucking K as KDE corporate identity… the could think of it as windows konquer or anything like it, are you idiot?